Ron Paul came second in New Hampshire primary yesterday.
Who really is Ron Paul? The answer lies in an interview he gave to Iranian television in January 2009, which was the time of the Israel war with Hamas.
The source for the following is secondary but you can follow the source right back:
Not only did he dub the war on Hamas terrorists an “atrocious massacre” and speak of America “blindly” supporting Israel, but he commented, “To me, I look at it [meaning Gaza] like a concentration camp and people are making homemade bombs and, uh, like they’re the aggressors?”
The homemade bombs that Paul is referring to on Iranian TV is indeed the many thousands of rockets that had rained down on Israel ever since Israel pulled out of the Gaza and handed the Gaza to Fatah, then conquered by Hamas, to use as a firing strip.
The source for that statement is the following:
The writer is Michael Brown in January 2012 (just days ago)
Brown has done well in going back to that Iranian TV interview (of jan 20019) so listen to this extra comment by Paul. Paul talks in a somewhat convoluted form but read it all anyway:
Although Paul made clear that politically, he didn’t want America to be involved in the conflict, he explained that he wanted to say, “Well, you know, I think the Palestinians have been ripped off and therefore all the blame is on Israel.” But if he said those words, which reflected his “personal opinion,” he would have “sort of stepped in a little more than I wanted to.”
You can see how your mind is being led around in a circle by this kind of language. His personal opinion! What on earth does he mean by that! Nothing personal possible this is deeply political.
But the essence is there. It is unmistakable. He is saying:
· The Palestinians have been ripped off
· All the blame is on Israel
Consider this also dealing with a book by Paul again explained by Brown:
In his 2011 book Liberty Defined he made clear that he was sympathetic to sentiments expressed by President Jimmy Carter in his infamous 2007 volume Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid.
Specifically, on pages 317-319, Paul made reference to “the apartheid conditions that Palestinians are subjected to,” expressing his sympathies with this perspective before stating, “Even given all of this, my position on Israel is the same as my position with regard to any other countries.” (In other words, “even given” the alleged “apartheid conditions that Palestinians are subjected to.”) Paul also wrote, “Our strong support for Israel practically eliminates any desire for it to work out differences in the region by direct negotiations with organizations like the Arab League.”
Again we have convoluted thinking and writing by Paul. But the essence is:
· Israel is practising apartheid
· Palestinians are subjected to apartheid conditions
Notice in the above that Paul is using the term “Palestinians” and thus is promoting the Big Lie of our times, but that requires another article.
Notice also in the above that Paul holds the thought that Israel CAN negotiate with the Arab league, or with Hamas, with Iran or with whomever.
But that is to place THEM in the position of being victims, and Israel as being the all-powerful oppressor.
Now that is before we even get to the position of Paul as the promoter of conspiracy theory in general, and the whole method of conspiracy theorizing. You can understand that Paul is leading to Jewish Bankers, to the Rothchilds etc.
A very, very dangerous man!
'You can understand that Paul is leading to Jewish Bankers, to the Rothchilds etc.'
ReplyDeleteYou are thinking of Glenn Beck.
If you don't accept there's such a thing as the Palestinians you certainly are a racist.